[acc] Add clobbered-register annotation checker#231
Draft
mkannwischer wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Draft
[acc] Add clobbered-register annotation checker#231mkannwischer wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
mkannwischer wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
Add a static checker that verifies clobbered-register docstring annotations against the actual registers written, as determined by the existing information-flow analysis. Signed-off-by: Matthias J. Kannwischer <matthias@zerorisc.com>
mkannwischer
force-pushed
the
mjk/check-clobbered-regs
branch
from
23ddbbe to
334e46e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a static checker that verifies clobbered-register docstring annotations against the actual registers written, as determined by the existing information-flow analysis.
I have not yet fixed any annotations, so this is expected to fail in CI.
This draft PR is to test if it is feasible to run this test in CI.