Skip to content

v1.1: clarify auxiliary helper functions#36

Open
bennn wants to merge 2 commits intoutahplt:mainfrom
bennn:rename-helper-fns
Open

v1.1: clarify auxiliary helper functions#36
bennn wants to merge 2 commits intoutahplt:mainfrom
bennn:rename-helper-fns

Conversation

@bennn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bennn bennn commented Mar 12, 2026

rename helper functions to use the word "helper" instead of calling them "f" like normal test functions

add comments in README.md to clarify the purpose of helpers

this affects only the custom predicate benchmarks

@hanwenguo please take a look, because this PR bumps the version number (v1.1). Note that I did the simplest possible renaming: f -> helper, and didn't also rename functions from g -> f, which would be more consistent with the rest of the benchmark, but seems like more trouble than it's worth because calling the first test f is not a good convention in the first place.

rename helper functions to use the word "helper" instead of calling them "f" like normal test functions

add comments in README.md to clarify the purpose of helpers

this affects only the custom predicate benchmarks
@bennn bennn requested a review from hanwenguo March 12, 2026 23:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant