Skip to content

Resolve grammar rules in link reference definitions#2198

Merged
ehuss merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
TC/support-grammar-rules-in-link-definitions
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Resolve grammar rules in link reference definitions#2198
ehuss merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
TC/support-grammar-rules-in-link-definitions

Conversation

@traviscross
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, in our Markdown, we support [text][RULE_NAME] and [text][grammar-RULE_NAME] for linking to grammar rules, but we don't support this syntax within link reference definitions, i.e., [text]: grammar-RULE_NAME, even though we do support linking to (non-grammar) rule identifiers within link reference definitions. That's an inconsistency that continually surprises us. Let's fix that.

In this commit, we add grammar_link_references, which scans link reference definitions for destinations that match a grammar rule name -- either with a grammar- prefix or not. When a match is found, the destination is replaced with the resolved path and anchor, just as rule_link_references does for rules. Unrecognized destinations pass through unchanged, falling through to std_links for rustdoc resolution -- the same behavior as unresolved [text][NAME] reference links.

We also update the dev-guide to document the new feature in both links.md and grammar.md.

cc @ehuss

Currently, in our Markdown, we support `[text][RULE_NAME]` and
`[text][grammar-RULE_NAME]` for linking to grammar rules, but
we don't support this syntax within link reference definitions,
i.e., `[text]: grammar-RULE_NAME`, even though we do support
linking to (non-grammar) rule identifiers within link reference
definitions.  That's an inconsistency that continually surprises
us.  Let's fix that.

In this commit, we add `grammar_link_references`, which scans
link reference definitions for destinations that match a grammar
rule name -- either with a `grammar-` prefix or not.  When a match
is found, the destination is replaced with the resolved path and
anchor, just as `rule_link_references` does for rules.  Unrecognized
destinations pass through unchanged, falling through to `std_links`
for rustdoc resolution -- the same behavior as unresolved
`[text][NAME]` reference links.

We also update the dev-guide to document the new feature in both
`links.md` and `grammar.md`.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Mar 4, 2026
@traviscross traviscross mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ehuss ehuss added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 4, 2026
Merged via the queue into master with commit c49e89c Mar 4, 2026
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Mar 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants