Skip to content

RS: Clarified 80% memory limit for Active-Active DB eviction is per-shard#2987

Open
rrelledge wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
DOC-6213
Open

RS: Clarified 80% memory limit for Active-Active DB eviction is per-shard#2987
rrelledge wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
DOC-6213

Conversation

@rrelledge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@rrelledge rrelledge commented Apr 6, 2026

Note

Low Risk
Low risk: documentation-only changes clarifying eviction behavior and thresholds, with no runtime code impact.

Overview
Clarifies eviction behavior to emphasize per-shard memory tracking in clustered databases, including that uneven key distribution can trigger eviction on some shards before the overall database appears full.

Rewrites the Active-Active eviction section to explicitly state that the 80% eviction threshold is per-shard, and adds concise bullet points describing eviction rate increases, anti-over-eviction heuristics (80% vs 100%), and shard maxmemory adjustments; also includes minor wording/formatting cleanups (e.g., Auto Tiering note, out-of-memory casing).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 572c672. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@rrelledge rrelledge requested review from a team and AlonMagrafta April 6, 2026 21:20
@rrelledge rrelledge self-assigned this Apr 6, 2026
@rrelledge rrelledge added the rs Redis Software label Apr 6, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2026

DOC-6213

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2026

@jit-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

jit-ci bot commented Apr 6, 2026

🛡️ Jit Security Scan Results

CRITICAL HIGH MEDIUM

✅ No security findings were detected in this PR


Security scan by Jit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@dwdougherty dwdougherty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just the one suggestion. Otherwise, LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rs Redis Software

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants