Skip to content

docs: fix FAQ contraction#7363

Closed
Rohan5commit wants to merge 1 commit intopsf:mainfrom
Rohan5commit:docs/fix-faq-its-best-20260415
Closed

docs: fix FAQ contraction#7363
Rohan5commit wants to merge 1 commit intopsf:mainfrom
Rohan5commit:docs/fix-faq-its-best-20260415

Conversation

@Rohan5commit
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Fix the contraction in the FAQ guidance about decoding response content.

Related issue

  • N/A

Guideline alignment

  • Kept this to one focused docs-only file change.
  • No behavior, test, fixture, changelog, or generated-file changes.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • Not run: broader tests are unnecessary for this docs-only change.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 15, 2026 02:44
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Docs-only change intended to correct wording in the community FAQ section about how Requests decodes response content.

Changes:

  • Updates the “does its best …” sentence in the “Encoded Data?” FAQ entry.

Comment thread docs/community/faq.rst

Requests automatically decompresses gzip-encoded responses, and does
its best to decode response content to unicode when possible.
it's best to decode response content to unicode when possible.
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 15, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The phrase here should be possessive: “does its best …”. Using “it’s” expands to “it is”, which changes the meaning (“and does it is best …” is ungrammatical). Please change this back to “its” (you can keep the de-indented wrap so it stays part of the same paragraph).

Suggested change
it's best to decode response content to unicode when possible.
its best to decode response content to unicode when possible.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@nateprewitt nateprewitt added the mass-automation-pr This PR was created from an account spamming large projects with "fixes". label Apr 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mass-automation-pr This PR was created from an account spamming large projects with "fixes".

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants