fix(site): posthog site cleanup

[mhartington]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal site configuration identifier.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
blog	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 6, 2026 1:55pm
docs	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 6, 2026 1:55pm
eclipse	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 6, 2026 1:55pm
site	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 6, 2026 1:55pm

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 52fb8c26-1966-452c-90d5-69f07a92b344

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67daddc and 240b790.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/site/src/instrumentation-client.ts

---

Walkthrough

The PostHog instrumentation client configuration updates the site name identifier from "mono-blog" to "mono-site" during initialization. This is a direct property value change with no modifications to control flow or error handling logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
PostHog Configuration apps/site/src/instrumentation-client.ts	Updated the site_name property in PostHog's posthog.register call from "mono-blog" to "mono-site", reflecting a naming convention alignment for the application identifier.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title refers to a real change in the PR (PostHog configuration update) but uses vague language ('cleanup') that doesn't clearly convey what was actually fixed.	Consider a more specific title like 'fix(site): update posthog site_name to mono-site' to clearly describe the actual change being made.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[argos-ci]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build	Status	Details	Updated (UTC)
default (Inspect)	✅ No changes detected	-	Apr 6, 2026, 2:02 PM