DNM Debug#1472
Conversation
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
@jmencak: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jmencak. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jmencak The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
approved
|
/agentic_describe |
Review Summary by QodoAdd trailing whitespace to README title
WalkthroughsDescription• Trailing whitespace added to README title File Changes1. README.md
|
|
/test e2e-hypershift-pao |
|
Unsupported PR languages |
WalkthroughMinor updates to documentation and test files: README title spacing adjustment and addition of an early error assertion in the OCP-37415 Ginkgo test. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 7 | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (7 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.11.4)level=error msg="Running error: context loading failed: failed to load packages: failed to load packages: failed to load with go/packages: err: exit status 1: stderr: go: inconsistent vendoring in :\n\tgithub.com/RHsyseng/operator-utils@v1.4.13: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/coreos/go-systemd@v0.0.0-20191104093116-d3cd4ed1dbcf: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/coreos/ignition@v0.35.0: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/coreos/ignition/v2@v2.24.0: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/docker/go-units@v0.5.0: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/go-logr/stdr@v1.2.2: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/google/go-cmp@v0.7.0 ... [truncated 19170 characters] ... is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers: is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/metrics: is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/mount-utils: is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/pod-security-admission: is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/sample-apiserver: is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2: is replaced in go.mod, but not marked as replaced in vendor/modules.txt\n\n\tTo ignore the vendor directory, use -mod=readonly or -mod=mod.\n\tTo sync the vendor directory, run:\n\t\tgo mod vendor\n" Comment |
|
/test all |
|
PR-Agent: could not fine a component named |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
1-1: Remove trailing whitespace in the top-level heading.Line 1 has an extra trailing space after
Operator; please remove it to avoid markdown lint/style noise.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` at line 1, The top-level Markdown heading "Node Tuning Operator " contains a trailing space; remove the extra whitespace so the heading is exactly "Node Tuning Operator" (update the README.md heading line to eliminate the trailing space).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@test/extended/nto.go`:
- Around line 39-41: Remove the intentional failing assertion and fix the
shadowed error variable: eliminate the g.By("fail intentionally...") and the
o.Expect(err).To(o.HaveOccurred()) assertion, and ensure the test uses the
package-level or outer-scoped err (do not redeclare err with := inside
BeforeEach); if you need to assert an actual error, assign to the existing err
variable (use =) and assert its value appropriately in the test instead of
forcing a failure.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 1: The top-level Markdown heading "Node Tuning Operator " contains a
trailing space; remove the extra whitespace so the heading is exactly "Node
Tuning Operator" (update the README.md heading line to eliminate the trailing
space).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: aa5a4f78-2105-47f6-9642-d0a92e33fd75
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mdtest/extended/nto.go
| g.By("fail intentionally for debugging in the CI to see if the tests are actually running") | ||
| o.Expect(err).To(o.HaveOccurred()) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Intentional test failure — must not be merged.
This debugging code will always fail: err is nil at this point because it's zero-initialized on line 24, and BeforeEach shadows it with a local variable (:= on line 31). The o.Expect(err).To(o.HaveOccurred()) assertion expects a non-nil error, so the test fails as intended.
Given the PR is marked as DNM/Draft with commit message "Fail intentionally", this appears to serve its purpose for CI debugging. Ensure this is removed before any real merge.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@test/extended/nto.go` around lines 39 - 41, Remove the intentional failing
assertion and fix the shadowed error variable: eliminate the g.By("fail
intentionally...") and the o.Expect(err).To(o.HaveOccurred()) assertion, and
ensure the test uses the package-level or outer-scoped err (do not redeclare err
with := inside BeforeEach); if you need to assert an actual error, assign to the
existing err variable (use =) and assert its value appropriately in the test
instead of forcing a failure.
|
/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-cluster-node-tuning-operator-main-e2e-aws openshift/origin#30598 |
|
@jmencak: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command |
|
/payload-job pull-ci-openshift-cluster-node-tuning-operator-main-e2e-aws-operator |
|
@jmencak: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial |
|
@jmencak: trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command |
|
@jmencak: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
1 participant
/cc
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Tests