This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add ENOBUFS handling for unsolicited messages#293
Open
Tuetuopay wants to merge 1 commit intolittle-dude:masterfrom
Open
Add ENOBUFS handling for unsolicited messages#293Tuetuopay wants to merge 1 commit intolittle-dude:masterfrom
Tuetuopay wants to merge 1 commit intolittle-dude:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Duh idiot me forgot the tests... I'll fix them tomorrow. |
Tuetuopay
force-pushed
the
handle-enobufs
branch
2 times, most recently
from
363c861 to
58dd138
Compare
This can happen when large burst of messages come all of a sudden, which happen very easily when routing protocols are involved (e.g. BGP). The current implementation incorrectly assumes that any failure to read from the socket is akin to the socket closed. This is not the case. This adds handling for this specific error, which translates to a wrapper struct in the unsolicited messages stream: either a message, or an overrun. This lets applications handle best for their usecase such event: either resync because messages are lost, or do nothing if the listening is informational only (e.g. logging).
Tuetuopay
force-pushed
the
handle-enobufs
branch
from
58dd138 to
185c3de
Compare
This was referenced Oct 12, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This can happen when large burst of messages come all of a sudden, which happen very easily when routing protocols are involved (e.g. BGP). The current implementation incorrectly assumes that any failure to read from the socket is akin to the socket closed. This is not the case.
This adds handling for this specific error, which translates to a wrapper struct in the unsolicited messages stream: either a message, or an overrun. This lets applications handle best for their usecase such event: either resync because messages are lost, or do nothing if the listening is informational only (e.g. logging).
This PR fixes the issue raised in #139