Skip to content

feat(audit): add arch-audit skill and first architecture scorecard#144

Merged
louis4li merged 10 commits intodevfrom
chore/2026-04-08_arch-audit-skill
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

feat(audit): add arch-audit skill and first architecture scorecard#144
louis4li merged 10 commits intodevfrom
chore/2026-04-08_arch-audit-skill

Conversation

@loning
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@loning loning commented Apr 7, 2026

Summary

  • Add /arch-audit skill for repeatable milestone-oriented architecture compliance audits
  • Add first architecture scorecard: overall 5.0/10, 6 milestone blockers identified
  • Add skill routing to CLAUDE.md

Audit Results

Overall health: 5.0/10 (CEO repo self-assessed "A grade" on April 2)

Dimension Score
CI Guards 9/10
分层合规 8/10
投影一致性 4/10
读写分离 8/10
Actor 生命周期 5/10
前端可构建性 2/10
测试覆盖 (agents/) 0/10

Fixes #143

Test plan

  • /arch-audit skill loads correctly (verified in skill list)
  • Scorecard follows docs/ frontmatter convention (title, status, owner)
  • Louis reviews milestone blockers and classifies as intentional vs accidental

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- Add /arch-audit skill (.claude/skills/arch-audit/SKILL.md) for
  repeatable milestone-oriented architecture compliance audits
- Add first scorecard (docs/audit-scorecard/2026-04-08-architecture-audit.md):
  overall 5.0/10, 6 milestone blockers, 6 backlog items
- Add arch-audit routing to CLAUDE.md skill routing section

Key findings from first audit:
- CI guards pass (9/10) but don't scan agents/ directory
- Host layer bypasses projection pipeline (3 endpoints)
- agents/ has ConcurrentDictionary singletons as fact sources
- agents/ has zero test coverage
- Both frontend projects fail to build

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
loning and others added 5 commits April 8, 2026 02:32
- Introduce a comprehensive analysis report for the architecture audit, expanding on the initial scorecard findings.
- Include detailed evaluations across multiple dimensions, highlighting compliance scores, critical violations, and proposed remediation strategies.
- Document specific code paths and issues related to projection consistency, middleware state leakage, and query integrity.

Key insights:
- Identified multiple critical violations in projection handling and state management.
- Provided a structured approach for addressing architectural deficiencies and improving overall system health.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…scores

- Adjusted the overall architecture health score from 4.9 to 5.1, reflecting improvements in governance capabilities.
- Removed outdated sections on governance analysis and streamlined the report for clarity.
- Enhanced the documentation of compliance issues and architectural insights, focusing on serialization compliance and governance abstractions.

Key updates:
- Improved governance score due to the implementation of a runtime policy evaluation engine.
- Clarified missing governance abstractions and compliance issues in the architecture.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Deleted the architecture audit report for 2026-04-08, which contained detailed evaluations and scores across various dimensions.
- The removal is part of a cleanup effort to streamline documentation and focus on more current audit findings.

Key points:
- The report included critical violations and governance insights that are no longer relevant.
- This action helps maintain the accuracy and relevance of the audit documentation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…cores and detailed analysis

- Adjusted the CI Guards compliance score from 9/10 to 8/10, noting that three rules remain unautomated.
- Expanded the report to include additional dimensions, raising the overall architecture health score from 5.1 to 5.3.
- Introduced a comprehensive analysis of test coverage, identifying 7-9 projects with zero coverage and outlining associated risks.
- Added detailed assessments of middleware compliance and workflow engine resilience, highlighting critical violations and remediation strategies.

Key updates:
- Enhanced clarity on compliance issues and architectural insights, focusing on areas requiring immediate attention.
- Provided actionable recommendations for improving test coverage and addressing identified risks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.65%. Comparing base (7821919) to head (7d38ea7).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on dev.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #144   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.65%   81.65%           
=======================================
  Files         756      756           
  Lines       48362    48362           
  Branches     6407     6407           
=======================================
+ Hits        39491    39492    +1     
+ Misses       6106     6105    -1     
  Partials     2765     2765           
Flag Coverage Δ
ci 81.65% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@louis4li louis4li merged commit ea09ca2 into dev Apr 10, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Architecture audit: 6 milestone blockers for Living with AI Demo (04-17) and NyxID M0 (04-18)

2 participants