Skip to content

OpenClaw affected by denial of service via unbounded webhook request body buffering

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Feb 15, 2026 in openclaw/openclaw • Updated Feb 18, 2026

Package

npm clawdbot (npm)

Affected versions

<= 2026.1.24-3

Patched versions

None
npm openclaw (npm)
< 2026.2.13
2026.2.13

Description

Summary

Multiple webhook handlers accepted and buffered request bodies without a strict unified byte/time limit. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send oversized payloads and cause memory pressure, degrading availability.

Details

Affected packages:

  • openclaw (npm): <2026.2.12
  • clawdbot (npm): <=2026.1.24-3

Root cause:

  • Webhook code paths buffered request payloads without consistent maxBytes + timeoutMs enforcement.
  • Some SDK-backed handlers parse request bodies internally and needed stream-level guards.

Attack shape:

  • Send very large JSON payloads or slow/incomplete uploads to webhook endpoints.
  • Observe elevated memory usage and request handler pressure.

Impact

Remote unauthenticated availability impact (DoS) via request body amplification/memory pressure.

Patch details (implemented)

  • Added shared bounded request-body helper in src/infra/http-body.ts.
  • Exported helper in src/plugin-sdk/index.ts for extension reuse.
  • Migrated webhook body readers to shared helper for:
    • LINE
    • Nextcloud Talk
    • Google Chat
    • Zalo
    • BlueBubbles
    • Nostr profile HTTP
    • Voice-call
    • Gateway hooks
  • Added stream guards for SDK handlers that parse request bodies internally:
    • Slack
    • Telegram
    • Feishu
  • Added explicit Express JSON body limit handling for MS Teams webhook path.
  • Standardized failure responses:
    • 413 Payload Too Large
    • 408 Request Timeout

Tests

  • Added regression tests:
    • src/infra/http-body.test.ts
    • src/line/monitor.read-body.test.ts
    • extensions/nextcloud-talk/src/monitor.read-body.test.ts
  • Focused webhook/security test suite passes for patched paths.

Remediation

Upgrade to the first release containing this patch.

Credits

Thanks @vincentkoc for reporting.

References

@steipete steipete published to openclaw/openclaw Feb 15, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 18, 2026
Reviewed Feb 18, 2026
Last updated Feb 18, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-q447-rj3r-2cgh

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.