Skip to content

OpenClaw affected by cross-site request forgery (CSRF) through loopback browser mutation endpoints

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Feb 15, 2026 in openclaw/openclaw • Updated Feb 20, 2026

Package

npm clawdbot (npm)

Affected versions

<= 2026.1.24-3

Patched versions

None
npm openclaw (npm)
< 2026.2.14
2026.2.14

Description

Summary

Browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins.

Impact

A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the browser control service is reachable on loopback in the victim's browser context.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • openclaw (npm): <= 2026.2.13
  • clawdbot (npm): <= 2026.1.24-3

Details

The browser control servers bind to loopback but exposed mutating HTTP endpoints without a CSRF-style guard. Browsers may send cross-origin requests to loopback addresses; without explicit validation, state-changing operations could be triggered from a non-loopback Origin/Referer.

Fix

Mutating HTTP methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) are rejected when the request indicates a non-loopback Origin/Referer (or Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site).

Fix Commit(s)

  • openclaw/openclaw: b566b09f81e2b704bf9398d8d97d5f7a90aa94c3

Workarounds / Mitigations

  • Enable browser control auth (token/password) and avoid running with auth disabled.
  • Upgrade to a release that includes the fix.

Credits

Release Process Note

patched_versions is set to the planned next release version. Once that npm release is published, the advisory should be ready to publish with no further edits.

References

@steipete steipete published to openclaw/openclaw Feb 15, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 18, 2026
Reviewed Feb 18, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 19, 2026
Last updated Feb 20, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(3rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-26317

GHSA ID

GHSA-3fqr-4cg8-h96q

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.