Skip to content

refactor(update): replace AxonIQ references with Axoniq#4471

Merged
smcvb merged 1 commit intoaxon-5.1.xfrom
refactor/axoniq-lowrcase-update-checker
Apr 28, 2026
Merged

refactor(update): replace AxonIQ references with Axoniq#4471
smcvb merged 1 commit intoaxon-5.1.xfrom
refactor/axoniq-lowrcase-update-checker

Conversation

@MateuszNaKodach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@MateuszNaKodach MateuszNaKodach requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2026 14:14
@MateuszNaKodach MateuszNaKodach requested review from hatzlj, hjohn and zambrovski and removed request for a team April 27, 2026 14:14
@MateuszNaKodach MateuszNaKodach self-assigned this Apr 27, 2026
@MateuszNaKodach MateuszNaKodach added Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project. labels Apr 27, 2026
@MateuszNaKodach MateuszNaKodach requested a review from smcvb April 27, 2026 14:14
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@MateuszNaKodach MateuszNaKodach added this to the Release 5.1.0 milestone Apr 27, 2026
@jangalinski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

lgtm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hatzlj hatzlj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, would briefly check if the receiving side requires a certain user agent

String axonBaseVersion = getAxonBaseVersion();
return String.format(
"AxonIQ UpdateChecker/%s (Java %s %s; %s; %s; %s)",
"Axoniq UpdateChecker/%s (Java %s %s; %s; %s; %s)",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is the receiving side expecting AxonIQ as the user-agent?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CodeDrivenMitch could you clarify here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not expecting anything, but values are recorded in SCARF. However, each of these values is also recorded separately.

Image

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's thus fine to change this, as a new version means a new entry anyway

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@smcvb smcvb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me 👍, but let's wait for @CodeDrivenMitch for the open question.

@smcvb smcvb merged commit 408db73 into axon-5.1.x Apr 28, 2026
10 checks passed
@smcvb smcvb deleted the refactor/axoniq-lowrcase-update-checker branch April 28, 2026 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Type: Enhancement Use to signal an issue enhances an already existing feature of the project.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants