-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
regression: error: expected one of !, ., ;, ?, {, }, or an operator, found :: #140223
Copy link
Copy link
Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned
Copy link
Labels
A-decl-macros-1-2Area: Declarative macros 1.2Area: Declarative macros 1.2A-macrosArea: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.S-has-bisectionStatus: A bisection has been found for this issueStatus: A bisection has been found for this issueregression-from-stable-to-betaPerformance or correctness regression from stable to beta.Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta.
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-decl-macros-1-2Area: Declarative macros 1.2Area: Declarative macros 1.2A-macrosArea: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.S-has-bisectionStatus: A bisection has been found for this issueStatus: A bisection has been found for this issueregression-from-stable-to-betaPerformance or correctness regression from stable to beta.Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
(and many more of the same)
With the suggested macro-backtrace, that particular instance reports:
Version it worked on
It most recently worked on: 1.86.0
Version with regression
rustc 1.87.0-beta.5 (386abeb93 2025-04-19)in crater #139827.@rustbot modify labels: +regression-from-stable-to-beta -regression-untriaged