Summary
PR #69 is implemented and all visible GitHub Actions workflows are green, but merge is blocked by branch protection reporting required status check lint as expected.
Affected PR
Current green checks on head 05ec69d79bb38fedf517ca640e36d4114ecb47a2
MeshRush Candidate: success
validate: success
lint: success
ci: success
Additional diagnostic
The GitHub combined status API for the head commit returns no legacy status contexts. This suggests the branch protection rule may be expecting a legacy commit status named lint, while the repository currently emits GitHub Actions check runs.
Work already attempted
- Added the GAIA
/map workbench review candidate.
- Validation passed.
- Renamed the
lint workflow job from validate to lint on the PR branch to align the Actions check name with the required context.
- Merge remains blocked with:
Required status check "lint" is expected.
Acceptance criteria
- Branch protection is updated to require the Actions check context that actually exists, or
- the repository emits the expected legacy
lint status context, or
- maintainers explicitly merge using an approved administrative path.
Constraint
Do not weaken review or validation requirements. The candidate itself is advisory and evidence-only; this is a status-context wiring issue, not a code validation failure.
Summary
PR #69 is implemented and all visible GitHub Actions workflows are green, but merge is blocked by branch protection reporting required status check
lintas expected.Affected PR
Current green checks on head
05ec69d79bb38fedf517ca640e36d4114ecb47a2MeshRush Candidate: successvalidate: successlint: successci: successAdditional diagnostic
The GitHub combined status API for the head commit returns no legacy status contexts. This suggests the branch protection rule may be expecting a legacy commit status named
lint, while the repository currently emits GitHub Actions check runs.Work already attempted
/mapworkbench review candidate.lintworkflow job fromvalidatetolinton the PR branch to align the Actions check name with the required context.Required status check "lint" is expected.Acceptance criteria
lintstatus context, orConstraint
Do not weaken review or validation requirements. The candidate itself is advisory and evidence-only; this is a status-context wiring issue, not a code validation failure.