What about promises instead of callbacks?

[nilzen]

Any thoughts @Hexagon @kmpm ? Can't think of an issue to have both though...

[Hexagon]

As the promises is dropped in node (According to http://howtonode.org/promises) i would prefer the standard way. But if it doesn't cause any overhead (and someone find the time to implement it) I guess we could support both styles :)

[kmpm]

I like promises alot.... using https://github.com/kriskowal/q for example.
But perhaps later and definitely not replacing normal callbacks. I would be happy if we could get those sorted out first.
Promises is just adding some logic to the wrapper in it's simplest form.

[nilzen]

It feels like its trivial to add, I can look in to it later. Regarding that promises were dropped in Node 0.2, so would I have done with that syntax (attaching to events). The Q way of doing it with chainable code is much nicer!

[kmpm]

I would possibly move this to a later milestone and get node style callbacks stabilized first.

[Hexagon]

Check :)

[nilzen]

I haven't got time to look in to this now, but more and more ppl are moving towards promises in node as well http://spion.github.io/posts/why-i-am-switching-to-promises.html

[kmpm]

It's no question about doing it or not, if you ask me.
It's a matter of time :)

[Hexagon]

Removed milestone, it will be implemented when someone submit a pull request :)